Articles

Environmental DNA-based approaches for biomonitoring in Lakes : applications to fish populations

Isabelle DOMAIZON, Marine VAUTIER, Maxime LOGEZ, Jonas BYLEMANS, Cécile CHARDON, Alix HERVE, Cyrielle GALLIEGUE, Laury BOUVET, Jean-Marc BAUDOIN
Received : 23 April 2026; Published : 20 July 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20870/Revue-SET.2026.51.10060

References

  • Albert, J. S., Destouni, G., Duke-Sylvester, S. M., Magurran, A. E., Oberdorff, T., Reis, R. E., Winemiller, K. O., & Ripple, W. J. (2021). Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Ambio, 50, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01318-8
  • Altermatt, F., Couton, M., Carraro, L., Keck, F., Lawson-Handley, L., Leese, F., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., & Blackman, R. C. (2025). Utilizing aquatic environmental DNA to address global biodiversity targets. Nature Reviews Biodiversity, 1(5), 332‑346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-025-00044-x
  • Barnes, M. A., Turner, C. R., Jerde, C. L., Renshaw, M. A., Chadderton, W. L., & Lodge, D. M. (2014). Environmental Conditions Influence eDNA Persistence in Aquatic Systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(3), 1819‑1827. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404734p
  • Bracken, F. S. A., Rooney, S. M., Kelly-Quinn, M., King, J. J., & Carlsson, J. (2019). Identifying Spawning Sites and Other Critical Habitat in Lotic Systems Using eDNA “Snapshots”: A Case Study Using the Sea Lamprey Petromyzon marinus L. Ecology and Evolution, 9, 553-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4777
  • Bylemans, J., Furlan, E. M., Hardy, C. M., McGuffie, P., Lintermans, M. & Gleeson, D. M. (2017). An environmental DNA-based method for monitoring spawning activity: a case study, using the endangered Macquarie perch (Macquaria australasica). Methods In Ecology And Evolution, 8(5), 646-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12709
  • Bylemans, J., Gleeson, D. M., Hardy, C. M., & Furlan, E. (2018). Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers : A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray–Darling Basin (Australia). Ecology And Evolution, 8(17), 8697‑8712. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4387
  • Capo, E., Spong, G., Koizumi, S., Puts, I., Olajos, F., Königsson, H., Karlsson, J., & Byström, P. (2021). Droplet digital PCR applied to environmental DNA, a promising method to estimate fish population abundance from humic-rich aquatic ecosystems. Environmental DNA, 3(2), 343‑352. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.115
  • Civade, R., Dejean, T., Valentini, A., Roset, N., Raymond, J., Bonin, A., Taberlet, P., & Pont, D. (2016). Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157366. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157366
  • Closek, C., Starks,H., Andruszkiewicz, E., Boehm,A. (2019). Environmental DNA (eDNA) extraction with modified Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.yrqfv5w
  • Cristescu, M. E. (2019). Can environmental RNA revolutionize biodiversity science ? Trends In Ecology & Evolution, 34(8), 694‑697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.05.003
  • Deiner, K., & Altermatt, F. (2014). Transport Distance of Invertebrate Environmental DNA in a Natural River. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088786
  • Di Muri, C., Lawson Handley, L., Bean, C. W., Benucci, M., Harper, L. R., James, B., Li, J., Winfield, I. J., & Hänfling, B. (2023). Spatio-temporal monitoring of lake fish spawning activity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Environmental DNA, 5, 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.343
  • Domaizon, I., Winegardner, A., Capo, E., Gauthier, J., & Gregory-Eaves, I. (2017). DNA-based methods in paleolimnology : new opportunities for investigating long-term dynamics of lacustrine biodiversity. Journal Of Paleolimnology, 58(1), 1‑21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-017-9958-y
  • Dudgeon, D. (2019). Multiple threats imperil freshwater biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Current Biology, 29(19), 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.002
  • Eichmiller, J. J., Bajer, P. G., & Sorensen, P. W. (2014). The Relationship between the Distribution of Common Carp and Their Environmental DNA in a Small Lake. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112611
  • Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2008). Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters, 4(4), 423-425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118
  • Gauvin, P., Domaizon, I., Bouchez, A. & Rimet, F. (2025). Environmental Matrices Need Consideration: Insights From Water and Biofilm Environmental DNA for Multi-Taxonomic Biomonitoring. Environmental DNA, 7, e70079. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70079
  • Ghosal, R., Eichmiller, J. J., Witthuhn, B. A., & Sorensen, P. W. (2018). Attracting Common Carp to a bait site with food reveals strong positive relationships between fish density, feeding activity, environmental DNA, and sex pheromone release that could be used in invasive fish management. Ecology and Evolution, 8(13), 6714-6727. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4169
  • Handley, L. L., Read, D. S., Winfield, I. J., Kimbell, H., Johnson, H., Li, J., Hahn, C., Blackman, R., Wilcox, R., Donnelly, R., Szitenberg, A., & Hänfling, B. (2019). Temporal and spatial variation in distribution of fish environmental DNA in England’s largest lake. Environmental DNA, 1(1), 26‑39. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.5
  • Hänfling, B., Handley, L. L., Read, D. S., Hahn, C., Li, J., Nichols, P., Blackman, R. C., Oliver, A., & Winfield, I. (2016b). Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Molecular Ecology, 25(13), 3101-3119. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13660
  • Hänfling, B., Handley, L. L., Read, D. S., & Winfield, I. (2016a). eDNA-based metabarcoding as a monitoring tool for fish in large lakes. Report – SC140018/R, Environment Agency, Horizon House, Deanery Road, Bristol, BS1 5AH. https://cieem.net/resource/edna-based-metabarcoding-as-a-monitoring-tool-for-fish-in-large-lakes/
  • Harper, L. R., Handley, L. L., Carpenter, A. I., Ghazali, M., Di Muri, C., Macgregor, C. J., Logan, T. W., Law, A., Breithaupt, T., Read, D. S., McDevitt, A. D., & Hänfling, B. (2019). Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals. Biological Conservation, 238, 108225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108225
  • Harrison, J. B., Sunday, J. M., Rogers, S. M. (2019). Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity. Proceedings Of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 286(1915), 20191409. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1409
  • Hervé, A. (2023). Standardisation d’une méthode de suivi de la faune piscicole en écosystèmes lentiques par l’ADN environnemental. Université Savoie Montblanc. https://theses.hal.science/tel-04499862/file/HERVE_2023_archivage.pdf
  • Hervé, A., Domaizon, I., Baudoin, J., Dejean, T., Gibert, P., Jean, P., Peroux, T., Raymond, J., Valentini, A., Vautier, M., & Logez, M.(2022). Spatio-temporal variability of eDNA signal and its implication for fish monitoring in lakes. PLOS ONE, 17, e0272660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272660
  • Jensen, M. R., Sigsgaard, E. E., De Paula Ávila, M., Agersnap, S., Brenner-Larsen, W., Sengupta, M. E., Xing, Y., Krag, M. A., Knudsen, S. W., Carl, H., Møller, P. R., & Thomsen, P. F. (2022). Short-term temporal variation of coastal marine eDNA. Environmental DNA, 4(4), 747‑762. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.285
  • Jo, T., Arimoto, M., Murakami, H., Masuda, R., & Minamoto, T. (2020). Estimating shedding and decay rates of environmental nuclear DNA with relation to water temperature and biomass. Environmental DNA, 2(2), 140‑151. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.51
  • Lacoursière-Roussel, A., Côté, G., Leclerc, V. & Bernatchez, L. (2016). Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management. Journal Of Applied Ecology, 53(4), 1148-1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12598
  • Littlefair, J. E., Hrenchuk, L. E., Blanchfield, P. J., Rennie, M. D., & Cristescu, M. E. (2021). Thermal stratification and fish thermal preference explain vertical eDNA distributions in lakes. Molecular Ecology, 30(13), 3083-3096. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15623
  • Lopez, M. L. D., Bonderud, M., Allison, M. J., MacDermid, F., Ussery, E. J., McMaster, M. E., Dersch, A., Drevnick, P., & Helbing, C. C. (2024). Reconstructing historical fish occurrence and documenting human-mediated introductions in lakes using sedimentary DNA. Global Ecology And Conservation, 54, e03040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03040
  • Marshall, N. T., Vanderploeg, H. A. & Chaganti, S. R. (2021). Environmental (e)RNA advances the reliability of eDNA by predicting its age. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2769 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82205-4
  • Miya, M., Sato, Y., Fukunaga, T., Sado, T., Poulsen, J. Y., Sato, K., Minamoto, T., Yamamoto, S., Yamanaka, H., Araki, H., Kondoh, M., & Iwasaki, W. (2015). MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes : detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. Royal Society Open Science, 2(7), 150088. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150088
  • Miyata, K., Inoue, Y., Amano, Y., Nishioka, T., Yamane, M., Kawaguchi, T., Morita, O., & Honda, H. (2021). Fish environmental RNA enables precise ecological surveys with high positive predictivity. Ecological Indicators, 128, 107796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107796
  • Nevers, M. B., Byappanahalli, M. N., Morris, C. C., Shively, D., Przybyla-Kelly, K., Spoljaric, A. M., Dickey, J., & Roseman, E. F. (2018). Environmental DNA (eDNA) : A tool for quantifying the abundant but elusive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus). PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0191720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191720
  • Pawlowski, J., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L., & Altermatt, F. (2020). Environmental DNA : What’s behind the term ? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring. Molecular Ecology, 29(22), 4258‑4264. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15643
  • Pawlowski, J., Kelly-Quinn, M., Altermatt, F., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L., Beja, P., Boggero, A., Borja, A., Bouchez, A., Cordier, T., Domaizon, I., Feio, M. J., Filipe, A. F., Fornaroli, R., Graf, W., Herder, J., Van Der Hoorn, B., Jones, J. I., Sagova-Mareckova, M., Moritz, C.,. . . Kahlert, M. (2018). The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era : Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems. The Science Of The Total Environment, 637‑638, 1295‑1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.002
  • Pont, D., Meulenbroek, P., Bammer, V., Dejean, T., Erős, T., Jean, P., Lenhardt, M., Nagel, C., Pekarik, L., Schabuss, M., Stoeckle, B. C., Stoica, E., Zornig, H., Weigand, A., & Valentini, A. (2023). Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR. Molecular Ecology Resources, 23(2), 396‑409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13715
  • Pont, D., Rocle, M., Valentini, A., Civade, R., Jean, P., Maire, A., Roset, N., Schabuss, M., Zornig, H., & Dejean, T. (2018). Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 10361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28424-8
  • Pukk, L., Kanefsky, J., Heathman, A. L., Weise, E. M., Nathan, L. R., Herbst, S. J., Sard, N. M., Scribner, K. T., & Robinson, J. D. (2021). eDNA metabarcoding in lakes to quantify influences of landscape features and human activity on aquatic invasive species prevalence and fish community diversity. Diversity And Distributions, 27(10), 2016‑2031. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13370
  • Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N., Zinger, L., Kinziger, A., Bik, H. M., Bonin, A., Coissac, E., Emerson, B. C., Lopes, C. M., Pelletier, T. A., Taberlet, P., & Narum, S. (2021). Biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology Resources, 21(5), 1405‑1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13399
  • Rourke, M. L., Fowler, A. M., Hughes, J. M., Broadhurst, M. K., DiBattista, J. D., Fielder, S., Walburn, J. W., & Furlan, E. M. (2022). Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass : A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys. Environmental DNA, 4(1), 9‑33. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.185
  • Rund, H., Kurmayer, R., Dobrovolny, S., Luger, M., & Wanzenböck, J. (2025). Application of eDNA metabarcoding to assess spatial distribution and habitat use by freshwater fish in a peri-alpine lake. Ecological Indicators, 174, 113459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113459
  • Sato, H., Sogo, Y., Doi, H., & Yamanaka, H. (2017). Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 14860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14978-6
  • Sayer, C. A., Fernando, E., Jimenez, R. R., Macfarlane, N. B. W., Rapacciuolo, G., Böhm, M., Brooks, T. M., Contreras-MacBeath, T., Cox, N. A., Harrison, I., Hoffmann, M., Jenkins, R., Smith, K. G., Vié, J., Abbott, J. C., Allen, D. J., Allen, G. R., Barrios, V., Boudot, J.,. . . Darwall, W. R. T. (2025). One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction. Nature, 638(8049), 138‑145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08375-z
  • Sellers, G. S., Jerde, C. L., Harper, L. R., Benucci, M., Di Muri, C., Li, J., Peirson, G., Walsh, K., Hatton-Ellis, T., Duncan, W., Duguid, A., Ottewell, D., Willby, N., Law, A., Bean, C. W., Winfield, I. J., Read, D. S., Handley, L. L., & Hänfling, B. (2024). Optimising species detection probability and sampling effort in lake fish eDNA surveys. Metabarcoding And Metagenomics, 8. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.104655
  • Seymour, M., Durance, I., Cosby, B. J., Ransom-Jones, E., Deiner, K., Ormerod, S. J., Colbourne, J. K., Wilgar, G., Carvalho, G. R., De Bruyn, M., Edwards, F., Emmett, B. A., Bik, H. M., & Creer, S. (2018). Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms. Communications Biology, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-017-0005-3
  • Stewart, K. A. (2019). Understanding the effects of biotic and abiotic factors on sources of aquatic environmental DNA. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 983-1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01709-8
  • Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2012). Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1789‑1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05542.x
  • Takahara, T., Minamoto, T., Yamanaka, H., Doi, H., & Kawabata, Z. (2012). Estimation of Fish Biomass Using Environmental DNA. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035868
  • Takahashi, M., Saccò, M., Kestel, J. H., Nester, G., Campbell, M. A., Van Der Heyde, M., Heydenrych, M. J., Juszkiewicz, D. J., Nevill, P., Dawkins, K. L., Bessey, C., Fernandes, K., Miller, H., Power, M., Mousavi-Derazmahalleh, M., Newton, J. P., White, N. E., Richards, Z. T., & Allentoft, M. E. (2023). Aquatic environmental DNA : A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution. The Science Of The Total Environment, 873, 162322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162322
  • Takeuchi, A., Iijima, T., Kakuzen, W., Watanabe, S., Yamada, Y., Okamura, A., Horie, N., Mikawa, N., Miller, M. J., Kojima, T., & Tsukamoto, K. (2019). Release of eDNA by different life history stages and during spawning activities of laboratory-reared Japanese eels for interpretation of oceanic survey data. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 6074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42641-9
  • Thalinger, B., Kirschner, D., Pütz, Y., Moritz, C., Schwarzenberger, R., Wanzenböck, J., & Traugott, M. (2021). Lateral and longitudinal fish environmental DNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats. Environmental DNA, 3(1), 305‑318. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.171
  • Thomsen, P. F., & Willerslev, E. (2015). Environmental DNA – An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 183, 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019
  • Tsuri, K., Ikeda, S., Hirohara, T., Shimada, Y., Minamoto, T., & Yamanaka, H. (2021). Messenger RNA typing of environmental RNA (eRNA) : A case study on zebrafish tank water with perspectives for the future development of eRNA analysis on aquatic vertebrates. Environmental DNA, 3(1), 14‑21. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.169
  • Ushio, M., Murakami, H., Masuda, R., Sado, T., Miya, M., Sakurai, S., Yamanaka, H., Minamoto, T., & Kondoh, M. (2018). Quantitative monitoring of multispecies fish environmental DNA using high-throughput sequencing. Metabarcoding And Metagenomics, 2. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.2.23297
  • Valentini, A., Taberlet, P., Miaud, C., Civade, R., Herder, J., Thomsen, P. F., Bellemain, E., Besnard, A., Coissac, E., Boyer, F., Gaboriaud, C., Jean, P., Poulet, N., Roset, N., Copp, G. H., Geniez, P., Pont, D., Argillier, C., Baudoin, J.,. . . Dejean, T. (2016). Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology, 25(4), 929‑942. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13428
  • Vautier, M., Bylemans, J., Baudoin, J., Guillard, J., Goulon, C., Logez, M., & Domaizon, I. (2026). Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling strategies influence estimates of lake fish eDNA concentrations. Knowledge And Management Of Aquatic Ecosystems, 427, 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2026004
  • Vautier, M., Chardon, C., Goulon, C., Guillard, J., & Domaizon, I. (2023). A quantitative eDNA-based approach to monitor fish spawning in lakes : Application to European perch and whitefish. Fisheries Research, 264, 106708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106708
  • Von Ammon, U., Wood, S. A., Laroche, O., Zaiko, A., Lavery, S. D., Inglis, G. J., & Pochon, X. (2019). Linking Environmental DNA and RNA for Improved Detection of the Marine Invasive Fanworm Sabella spallanzanii. Frontiers In Marine Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00621
  • WWF. (2020). Rapport planète vivante 2020. https://www.wwf.fr/sites/default/files/doc-2020-11/20200910_Rapport_Planete_Vivante_WWF.pdf
  • Zhang, S., Lu, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Zhao, J., & Yao, M. (2020). Assessment of fish communities using environmental DNA : Effect of spatial sampling design in lentic systems of different sizes. Molecular Ecology Resources, 20(1), 242‑255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13105
  • Zou, N., Wang, S., Wang, S., Qiu, W., Kong, W., Wang, G., Wang, S., & Wang, S. (2025). Environmental RNA as a transformative tool for aquatic ecosystem health assessment : progress and challenges. Ecological Indicators, 180, 114328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114328

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) represents a major advancement for the study and monitoring of aquatic biodiversity. It offers a non-invasive alternative to traditional biomonitoring methods, while providing particularly effective tools in hard-to-access environments or for detecting elusive and/or low-abundance species.After reviewing the main challenges, as well as the advantages and limitations of eDNA-based approaches for monitoring lake ecosystems, this article presents several recent developments and applications of these methods for the study of fish populations and communities. The results illustrate (i) the capacity for targeted detection and quantification to study the reproductive phenology of several species using digital PCR, and (ii) the establishment of robust inventories of fish communities across various types of lakes, along with tests aimed at strengthening the retrieval of quantitative information from metabarcoding.

Authors

Isabelle DOMAIZON

isabelle.domaizon@inrae.fr

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Marine VAUTIER

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Maxime LOGEZ

Affiliation : INRAE, RIVERLY, 5 rue de la Doua, 69625 Villeurbanne Cedex / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Jonas BYLEMANS

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Cécile CHARDON

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Alix HERVE

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Cyrielle GALLIEGUE

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Laury BOUVET

Affiliation : Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 75 bis avenue de Corzent, 74203 Thonon-les-Bains / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

Jean-Marc BAUDOIN

Affiliation : OFB, DRAS, Service EcoAqua, Aix-en-Provence / Aix Marseille Univ., INRAE, RECOVER, 13182 Aix-en-Provence / Pôle R&D ECLA

Country : France

No supporting information for this article

Article statistics

Views: 12