Articles

Farmers appreciation and management of functional biodiversity in organic apple orchards

References

  • Cardona, A., Tchamitchian, M., Penvern, S., Dufils, A., Jacobsen, S. K., Korsgaard, M., Sigsgaard, L. (2021). Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study. Ecological Indicators, 129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107883
  • Deguine, J. P., Penvern, S. (2014). Agroecological crop protection in organic farming: Relevance and limits. In: BELLON, S., Penvern, S. (eds), Organic farming, prototype for sustainable agricultures, 489 p., Springer, p.107-130, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7927-3_6
  • Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian journal of experimental agriculture, 46(11), 1407-1424, https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037
  • Penvern, S., Fernique, S., Cardona, A., Herz, A., Ahrenfeldt, E., Dufils, A., Jamar, L., Korsgaard, M., Kruczyńska, D., Matray, S., Ozolina-Pole, L., Porcel, M., Ralle, B., Steinemann, B., Świergiel, W., Tasin, M., Telfser, J., Warlop, F., Sigsgaard, L. (2019). Farmers’ management of functional biodiversity goes beyond pest management in organic European apple orchards. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 284, 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.05.014

Abstract

The benefits of functional diversity (FB) for pest control are under debate among practitioners and little is known about farmers’ practices and motivations to foster FB. We assumed that the use of monitoring methods would help the farmers to better appreciate the benefits of functional biodiversity and thus implement favorable practices. We performed a comprehensive approach combining wide semi-directive interviews and participatory workshops to describe farmers’ practices and perception and design monitoring methods adapted to their needs. Our findings provide empirical evidence that FB is associated with multiple services and dis-services and that farmers’ experience and time are two important conditions for farmers’ involvement for FB. Four main attitudes towards the management of FB were characterized: wait-and-see, naturalist, regulation and multifunctional. These attitudes provide a useful framework to design support tools and research programs in adequacy with farmers’ needs.

Authors


Servane PENVERN

servane.penvern@inrae.fr

Affiliation : INRAE, UR Écodéveloppement, Département Action, Territoires et Transitions, Avignon, Cedex 9

Country : France


Aurélie CARDONA

Affiliation : INRAE, UR Écodéveloppement, Département Action, Territoires et Transitions, Avignon, Cedex 9

Country : France


Marc TCHAMITCHIAN

Affiliation : INRAE, UR Écodéveloppement, Département Action, Territoires et Transitions, Avignon, Cedex 9

Country : France


Arnaud DUFILS

Affiliation : INRAE, UR Écodéveloppement, Département Action, Territoires et Transitions, Avignon, Cedex 9

Country : France


Weronika SWIERGIEL

Affiliation : Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp

Country : Sweden


Marco TASIN

Affiliation : Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp

Country : Sweden


Maren KORSGAARD

Affiliation : Ecoadvice, Gefion, Sorø

Country : Denmark


Annette HERZ

Affiliation : Julius Kühn Institut (JKI), Darmstadt

Country : Germany


lene SIGSGAARD

Affiliation : University of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Frederiksberg C

Country : Denmark

No supporting information for this article

Article statistics

Views: 4877