Analysing the connectivity of the turquoise infrastructure: definition, characterization, and operational issues
References
- Avon, C., Bergès, L. & Roche, P. (2014). Comment analyser la connectivité écologique des trames vertes ? Cas d'étude en région méditerranéenne. Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 14, 14-19. doi:10.3917/set.014.0011
- Capon, S. J., & Pettit, N. E. (2018). Turquoise is the new green: Restoring and enhancing riparian function in the Anthropocene. Ecological Management & Restoration, 19, 44-53. doi:10.1111/emr.12326
- Cayuela, H., Valenzuela-Sánchez, A., Teulier, L., Martinez-Solano, I., Lena, J., Merila, J., Muths, E. L., Shine, R., Quay, L., Denoel, M., Clobert, J., & Schmidt, B. (2020). Determinants and consequences of dispersal in vertebrates with complex life cycles: a review of pond-breeding amphibians. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 95, 1-36. doi:10.1086/707862
- Childers, D. L., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Marshall, V., Mc Grath, B., & Pickett, S. T. A. (2015). An ecology for cities: A transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability 7(4), 3774-3791. doi:10.3390/su7043774
- Diniz, M. F., Cushman, S. A., Machado, R.B., & De Marco Júnior, P. (2020) Landscape connectivity modeling from the perspective of animal dispersal. Landscape Ecology, 35, 41-58. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00935-3
- Jantz, S. M., Barker, B., Brooks, T. M., Chini, L. P., Huang, Q., Moore, R. M., Noel, J., & Hurtt, G. C. (2015). Future habitat loss and extinctions driven by land-use change in biodiversity hotspots under four scenarios of climate-change mitigation. Conservation Biology, 29, 1122-1131. doi:10.1111/cobi.12549
- Le Roux, M., Luque, S., Vincent, S., & Planckaert, O. (2014). Intégration de la connectivité dans la gestion et la conservation des habitats. Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 14, 20-25. doi:10.14758/SET-REVUE.2014.14.04
- Mell, I. C. (2008). Green infrastructure: Concepts and planning. FORUM Ejournal 8(1), 69-80.
- Semlitsch, R. D. (2003). Amphibian conservation, Smithsonian Books, 324 p.
- Shoo, L. P., Olson, D. H, Mc Menamin, S. K., Murray, K. A., Van Sluys, M., Donnelly, M. A., Stratford, D., Terhivuo, J., Merino-Viteri, A., Herbert, S. M., Bishop, P. J., Corn, P. S., Dovey, L., Griffiths, R. A., Lowe, K., Mahony, M., McCallum, H., Shuker, J. D., Simpkins, C., Skerratt, L. F., Williams, S. E., & Hero, J. M. (2011). Engineering a future for amphibians under climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48. 487-492, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01942.x
- Smith, L. l., Subalusky, A. l., Atkinson, C. l., Earl, J. E., Mushet, D. M., Scott, D. E., Lance, S. L., & Johnson, S. A. (2019). Biological Connectivity of Seasonally Ponded Wetlands across Spatial and Temporal Scales. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 55, 334-353. doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12682
Abstract
The fragmentation of the landscape is defined by a rupture of connection within ecological networks. The concept of green and blue infrastructure has emerged as a tool for the protection and restoration of ecological continuities in the territories. New ecological networks have recently been proposed to identify other effective ecological discontinuities. This is notably the case of the turquoise infrastructure associating the blue infrastructure and the part of the green infrastructure in functional interaction. It includes different types of aquatic and terrestrial habitats on which many species of amphibians, odonata and other invertebrates or chiropterans depend. The turquoise infrastructure is receiving increasing attention in the operational world, even though its definition and characterization methods are not yet stabilized. This article proposes to contribute to a better definition and understanding of the turquoise frame. Based on the landscape graph approach, which is now widely used to model ecological networks and measure their connectivity, the INTERFACE project has developed an innovative multi-habitat network protocol to consider habitat heterogeneity when assessing the connectivity of the turquoise infrastructure. It thus makes it possible to go beyond the delimitation of a buffer zone around watercourses and to identify functional zones to be preserved, vulnerable zones and points of conflict where it would be interesting to restore aquatic and/or terrestrial habitats to improve connectivity.
No supporting information for this article
Article statistics
Views: 8324