Articles

Analysing the connectivity of the turquoise infrastructure: definition, characterization, and operational issues

References

  • Avon, C., Bergès, L. & Roche, P. (2014). Comment analyser la connectivité écologique des trames vertes ? Cas d'étude en région méditerranéenne. Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 14, 14-19. doi:10.3917/set.014.0011
  • Capon, S. J., & Pettit, N. E. (2018). Turquoise is the new green: Restoring and enhancing riparian function in the Anthropocene. Ecological Management & Restoration, 19, 44-53. doi:10.1111/emr.12326
  • Cayuela, H., Valenzuela-Sánchez, A., Teulier, L., Martinez-Solano, I., Lena, J., Merila, J., Muths, E. L., Shine, R., Quay, L., Denoel, M., Clobert, J., & Schmidt, B. (2020). Determinants and consequences of dispersal in vertebrates with complex life cycles: a review of pond-breeding amphibians. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 95, 1-36. doi:10.1086/707862
  • Childers, D. L., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Marshall, V., Mc Grath, B., & Pickett, S. T. A. (2015). An ecology for cities: A transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability 7(4), 3774-3791. doi:10.3390/su7043774
  • Diniz, M. F., Cushman, S. A., Machado, R.B., & De Marco Júnior, P. (2020) Landscape connectivity modeling from the perspective of animal dispersal. Landscape Ecology, 35, 41-58. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00935-3
  • Jantz, S. M., Barker, B., Brooks, T. M., Chini, L. P., Huang, Q., Moore, R. M., Noel, J., & Hurtt, G. C. (2015). Future habitat loss and extinctions driven by land-use change in biodiversity hotspots under four scenarios of climate-change mitigation. Conservation Biology, 29, 1122-1131. doi:10.1111/cobi.12549
  • Le Roux, M., Luque, S., Vincent, S., & Planckaert, O. (2014). Intégration de la connectivité dans la gestion et la conservation des habitats. Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 14, 20-25. doi:10.14758/SET-REVUE.2014.14.04
  • Mell, I. C. (2008). Green infrastructure: Concepts and planning. FORUM Ejournal 8(1), 69-80.
  • Semlitsch, R. D. (2003). Amphibian conservation, Smithsonian Books, 324 p.
  • Shoo, L. P., Olson, D. H, Mc Menamin, S. K., Murray, K. A., Van Sluys, M., Donnelly, M. A., Stratford, D., Terhivuo, J., Merino-Viteri, A., Herbert, S. M., Bishop, P. J., Corn, P. S., Dovey, L., Griffiths, R. A., Lowe, K., Mahony, M., McCallum, H., Shuker, J. D., Simpkins, C., Skerratt, L. F., Williams, S. E., & Hero, J. M. (2011). Engineering a future for amphibians under climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48. 487-492, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01942.x
  • Smith, L. l., Subalusky, A. l., Atkinson, C. l., Earl, J. E., Mushet, D. M., Scott, D. E., Lance, S. L., & Johnson, S. A. (2019). Biological Connectivity of Seasonally Ponded Wetlands across Spatial and Temporal Scales. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 55, 334-353. doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12682

Abstract

The fragmentation of the landscape is defined by a rupture of connection within ecological networks. The concept of green and blue infrastructure has emerged as a tool for the protection and restoration of ecological continuities in the territories. New ecological networks have recently been proposed to identify other effective ecological discontinuities. This is notably the case of the turquoise infrastructure associating the blue infrastructure and the part of the green infrastructure in functional interaction. It includes different types of aquatic and terrestrial habitats on which many species of amphibians, odonata and other invertebrates or chiropterans depend. The turquoise infrastructure is receiving increasing attention in the operational world, even though its definition and characterization methods are not yet stabilized. This article proposes to contribute to a better definition and understanding of the turquoise frame. Based on the landscape graph approach, which is now widely used to model ecological networks and measure their connectivity, the INTERFACE project has developed an innovative multi-habitat network protocol to consider habitat heterogeneity when assessing the connectivity of the turquoise infrastructure. It thus makes it possible to go beyond the delimitation of a buffer zone around watercourses and to identify functional zones to be preserved, vulnerable zones and points of conflict where it would be interesting to restore aquatic and/or terrestrial habitats to improve connectivity.

Authors


Céline CLAUZEL

Affiliation : LADYSS UMR CNRS 7533, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 12 Place du Panthéon, 75005 Paris / Institut universitaire de France (IUF).

Country : France


Christophe EGGERT

Affiliation : Fauna Consult, 28 Rue de la Marne, 22410 Saint‑Quay‑Portrieux

Country : France


Simon TARABON

Affiliation : Ubiquiste, 18 rue Imbert Colomès, 69001 Lyon

Country : France


Lili PASQUET

Affiliation : Université Paris Cité, 85 boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris.

Country : France


Gilles VUIDEL

Affiliation : Université de Franche-Comté, ThéMA UMR CNRS 6049, 32 rue Mégevand, 25030 Besançon Cedex

Country : France


Marion BAILLEUL

Affiliation : Syndicat de la rivière La Juine et de ses affluents, Parc industriel SUDESSOR, 39 avenue des Grenôts, 91150 Étampes.

Country : France


Claude MIAUD

Affiliation : CEFE, Université Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-Université PSL, IRD, Montpellier, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5.

Country : France


Claire GODET

Affiliation : Consultante.

Country : France

Attachments

No supporting information for this article

Article statistics

Views: 7045